Reassessing Expectations
This morning, as she curled her hair tediously with a curling iron and cursed herself for running late, Bernie said to me, “Sam. I’m a bad person.” Used to the dramatics of Ms. Aurange, I asked her simply, “Why is that, Bernie?”
“You know, because of the whole thing with Mark,” she responded. “One minute I think I am not ready for a commitment, the next I am, and the whole time I am planning a rendezvous with the love of my life when he comes into town.”
“Bernie,” I said firmly. “You are not a bad person. You just don’t know what you want. That’s not a horrible thing- it’s just life.”
“But Mark wants a commitment,” she replied. “He is constantly telling me how wonderful I am and how he never likes someone as much as he likes me. I just feel so bad.” she replied. “ Bernie,” I said. “The man is thirty-four. He had to know what he was in for when he got involved with a twenty-three year old.” “Oh,” she said quickly, pausing mid-curl. “I guess you’re right.”
This wasn’t the first time I had heard from an older man frustrated with the all-over-the-place quality of a younger girl; my friend Justin had expressed the same sentiments to me several months ago. He, also particularly enchanted with an early twenty-something girl, was frustrated that she hadn’t expressed her undying love for him and planned the date of their marriage already. I tried to explain to him that, contrary to popular belief, not all women are perusing the Tiffany’s catalog within the first few months of meeting someone.
I told Bernie that as long as she was being clear with Mark about her feelings, however discombobulated they were, she wasn‘t in the wrong. “If he still wants to be with you,” I said, “knowing that a commitment from you isn’t a given, then he is making that decision, and he has to deal with whatever comes with that. Including the fact that he may not be the only one you are seeing.”
Bernie wasn’t really satisfied with that answer, continuing to whine as she tugged up her gray bobby socks (nope, definitely not ready for a commitment). Secretly, I think she likes the idea of having two men at her beck and call. Since that is kind of awesome, I told her.
Knowing what you are in for is an essential part of successfully navigating the dating/relationship world. The reason we are so easy to categorize potential mates into stereotypes (the rebel, the “nice guy“), and to compare them with those who we have dated in the past is because humans don’t like uncertainty. And we would rather make some kind of hypothesis about what is going to happen with Bob by relating it to what happened with Sam or with Joe, even if the hypothesis turns out to be incorrect, rather than to leave the future an amorphous blob of uncertainty.
We familiarize ourself with how certain types of people behave at certain times in order to help us navigate life.
Having the ability to make parallels between people and situations also helps us to be realistic. There may be two times out of ten where the vagabond rock star decides to move back to your home town in Indiana and settle down on a farm, and there may be another two times out of ten where the “nice guy” you are dating doesn’t turn out to be so nice. But that’s only twenty percent. The other eighty, as sad as it may be, usually ring true with what you have experienced in the past, which is also many times the stereotype of that person.
And stereotypes, contrary to popular belief, aren’t always bad. I was reading through my journal yesterday, and something stuck out to me. It read: “I always go after guys pursuing their dreams, passionate and spontaneous. What that means is that I will never be a priority in their lives until they have found out what they are looking for- as they will never be a priority in mine.” With life come tradeoffs. The passion and spontaneity and dreamer qualities that appeal to a lot of women most of the time don’t correspond with stability, with calling when they say they are going to call, or making a plan in advance for where you are having dinner (that is, if they plan ahead enough to take you to dinner at all.) And the stability and loyalty that we treasure so much as women usually don’t go hand in hand with a last minute trip to Paris, “just because.”
In the last comment on my blog “Forget the Guy, Pick a Man,” a comment so insightful I am going to republish it for everyone here to see, the writer explained these tradeoffs better than I ever could. He said: “It is an awareness that one male usually cannot provide everything. Men are, after all, just people.”
I think if we women take that into account, our expectations for our mates will be much more realistic- not necessary lower, just more realistic. And as Bernie explained without realizing it, she was discovering that alas, as much as men are just people, so are we.
This morning, as she curled her hair tediously with a curling iron and cursed herself for running late, Bernie said to me, “Sam. I’m a bad person.” Used to the dramatics of Ms. Aurange, I asked her simply, “Why is that, Bernie?”
“You know, because of the whole thing with Mark,” she responded. “One minute I think I am not ready for a commitment, the next I am, and the whole time I am planning a rendezvous with the love of my life when he comes into town.”
“Bernie,” I said firmly. “You are not a bad person. You just don’t know what you want. That’s not a horrible thing- it’s just life.”
“But Mark wants a commitment,” she replied. “He is constantly telling me how wonderful I am and how he never likes someone as much as he likes me. I just feel so bad.” she replied. “ Bernie,” I said. “The man is thirty-four. He had to know what he was in for when he got involved with a twenty-three year old.” “Oh,” she said quickly, pausing mid-curl. “I guess you’re right.”
This wasn’t the first time I had heard from an older man frustrated with the all-over-the-place quality of a younger girl; my friend Justin had expressed the same sentiments to me several months ago. He, also particularly enchanted with an early twenty-something girl, was frustrated that she hadn’t expressed her undying love for him and planned the date of their marriage already. I tried to explain to him that, contrary to popular belief, not all women are perusing the Tiffany’s catalog within the first few months of meeting someone.
I told Bernie that as long as she was being clear with Mark about her feelings, however discombobulated they were, she wasn‘t in the wrong. “If he still wants to be with you,” I said, “knowing that a commitment from you isn’t a given, then he is making that decision, and he has to deal with whatever comes with that. Including the fact that he may not be the only one you are seeing.”
Bernie wasn’t really satisfied with that answer, continuing to whine as she tugged up her gray bobby socks (nope, definitely not ready for a commitment). Secretly, I think she likes the idea of having two men at her beck and call. Since that is kind of awesome, I told her.
Knowing what you are in for is an essential part of successfully navigating the dating/relationship world. The reason we are so easy to categorize potential mates into stereotypes (the rebel, the “nice guy“), and to compare them with those who we have dated in the past is because humans don’t like uncertainty. And we would rather make some kind of hypothesis about what is going to happen with Bob by relating it to what happened with Sam or with Joe, even if the hypothesis turns out to be incorrect, rather than to leave the future an amorphous blob of uncertainty.
We familiarize ourself with how certain types of people behave at certain times in order to help us navigate life.
Having the ability to make parallels between people and situations also helps us to be realistic. There may be two times out of ten where the vagabond rock star decides to move back to your home town in Indiana and settle down on a farm, and there may be another two times out of ten where the “nice guy” you are dating doesn’t turn out to be so nice. But that’s only twenty percent. The other eighty, as sad as it may be, usually ring true with what you have experienced in the past, which is also many times the stereotype of that person.
And stereotypes, contrary to popular belief, aren’t always bad. I was reading through my journal yesterday, and something stuck out to me. It read: “I always go after guys pursuing their dreams, passionate and spontaneous. What that means is that I will never be a priority in their lives until they have found out what they are looking for- as they will never be a priority in mine.” With life come tradeoffs. The passion and spontaneity and dreamer qualities that appeal to a lot of women most of the time don’t correspond with stability, with calling when they say they are going to call, or making a plan in advance for where you are having dinner (that is, if they plan ahead enough to take you to dinner at all.) And the stability and loyalty that we treasure so much as women usually don’t go hand in hand with a last minute trip to Paris, “just because.”
In the last comment on my blog “Forget the Guy, Pick a Man,” a comment so insightful I am going to republish it for everyone here to see, the writer explained these tradeoffs better than I ever could. He said: “It is an awareness that one male usually cannot provide everything. Men are, after all, just people.”
I think if we women take that into account, our expectations for our mates will be much more realistic- not necessary lower, just more realistic. And as Bernie explained without realizing it, she was discovering that alas, as much as men are just people, so are we.