Archive for October, 2009

“When Love is a Schlep”- NY Times

Tuesday, October 27th, 2009

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/18/realestate/18cov.html?_r=2&ref=realestate

“When Love is a Schlep” (how great is that title by the way) details the irritating and oh-so-true fact about New York relationships: that often, dating in New York can feel like long- distance dating. This is enhanced by the insane work week, the spreading out of young people into the burroughs, and the fact that the subway takes freaking forever, particularly to go to places like Brooklyn and Queens.
My friend Sheila briefly dated a guy who lived in Washington Heights, while she resided in Brooklyn. He was also a workaholic. “Oy vey,” was all she said when I asked what happened to him. She didn’t need to explain any further.

Also, New York could be the worst place ever for “morning afters” in the case that a couple has decided to get intimate with each other (unless you live in the same apt building- and that’s just a bad idea). Particularly for couples who live in different neighborhoods, the idea of the morning after is enough to deter the night itself.

For guys it’s not so bad. They can hide their messy hair under a baseball cap and smooth out their polo. But for women, it’s the absolute worst. The subway is very public. Rather than being able to hop into the privacy of your own car, roll up the windows and put on a ratty sweatshirt from the backseat, the morning after in NYC means an embarrassing epiic of a subway ride home (see: black eye makeup smeared all over the face) or a very expensive cab ride, if your mate lives far away. Also, sometimes womens’ high heels are so high or skirts so short that it would be literally impossible to ride the subway home, for fear of death by tripping, or rape by well, raping. This guarantees a crazy expensive cab ride. A lot of the time it is easier to part ways at the end of the night, instead of going home with someone.

What does this do for couple’s intimacy levels who don’t live so close to one another in the city? Not a whole lot- because due to the inconvenience of getting to each other’s places, the couple always meets in a central location, as the Times article indicated. These types of central locations are devoid of space to have any sort of physical intimacy (PDA people aside…fyi, you are gross), and they are also simply impersonal. How can you truly understand someone if you have never seen the space that they live in? This space, and how they function in it, tells a lot about a person.

So is there an answer? The only thing I can think of is hanging out in your neighborhood when trying to meet people of the opposite sex, and particularly hanging out there during the week, when people are there just to chill and not to party.

So should you count someone out because they live in Astoria and you in Brooklyn? No. But you should be aware that it is going to be a lot harder to make things work than if the other person lived down the block.

How to Meet Women

Monday, October 26th, 2009

This video, from how to videos, gives you tips for meeting women.
http://www.howcast.com/videos/232661-How-To-Meet-Women?ref=htd

Besides being hilarious, as they usually are (see man’s facial expressions and poem about terminator 2) this video actually makes several good points.

Firstly, join an online dating site, like meezoog. Get it out of your head that you are a loser if you are online dating; consider it just another way to meet women, one that you can do in the comfort of your own home (or killing time at work) and without even spending any money (in the case of meezoog).

Second, the best way to say hello to a woman is just that, say hello. Better than any cheesy pick up line. Need more help with this? Refer to my article, “Starters for Guys.”

I also like how they point out that guys who show that they are considerate will attract female attention. Women consider considerate men few and far between, particularly in Oh-so-selfish- new york, so an act of helpfulness will majorly attract female attention. Help a woman carry her baby carriage up the stairs at the subway. Give a homeless man your change. If someone looks lost and is looking at a tourist map, ask if they need help and directions.
Besides making you look good to the opposite sex, these kinds of altruistic acts will also make you feel good about yourself.

They also make a point about confidence. Confidence is key, but remember, there is a fine line between confidence and ego. Just as a woman can smell confidence, she can also smell a big fat ego, and it does not smell good (like your gym clothes after hockey practice).

They allude to this when they tell you not to boast about yourself during speed dating (or any date for that matter). Asking questions about the woman and her life indicates that you are sensitive and insightful, which are also traits hard to find in a man. It also indicates that you are comfortable enough with yourself that you don’t need to boast.

Tip to avoid- the 5 o’clock shadow? I have no idea where that one came from…Clean shaven is ALWAYS preferable (unless you live in Brooklyn, as then a bit of stubble is expected).

Best way to find women? Right now on meezoog. Stop procrastinating and make it happen. That is why you are a New Yorker, isn’t it?

Linking Spirituality and Love in Art

Sunday, October 25th, 2009

The Guggenheim was packed on Wednesday. Crowds overflowed the white circular swirling ramps of the Upper East Side Museum, everyone jollied by the free admission and voraciously consuming the art on display.

The featured collection at the Guggenheim is by Wassily Kandinsky, an artist whose career spanned from the abstract to the linear, and from Germany, to Russia, and finally to France.

Kandinsky, like many artists, had repititive images that appeared in many of his paintings. One of these was the horse and rider. One of his most popular paintings, circa 1907, is called “A Couple Riding.” This painting shows entangled lovers on a white horse. The man looks tenderly down at the woman, as if at the end or at the beginning of a romantic embrace. The Guggenheim, in reflection on this painting, suggests that, “Here, as elsewhere, romantic love may be perceived as the way to spiritual redemption.” The Guggenheim defines spiritual redemption as “a better and more spiritual future,” as spirituality was one of Kandinsky’s main influences (music being the main other).

If one looks closely at the painting, the brilliant dots littered all over the backdrop of the city, and the horse and couple themselves, seem to light up the painting, creating the essence of spirituality and redemption that he was trying to portray.

As one who defines spirituality as an indescribable feeling that is more personal and internal than anything else, I put this blog out to you to give me your opinion on the subject.

This site, Recovery is Sexy, (I know, pretty great title huh) gives an interesting survey of how spirituality means different things to different people. They say (The recovery experts, I’m assuming) that:

“Spirituality is a word used in an abundance of contexts that means

different things for
different people at
different times in
different cultures.”

This being said, and I suggest you read the whole post before posting your opinion, what does spirituality mean to you? And how, if so, do you think it relates to romantic love?

“Pretending It’s Chocolate”- link from BackStage

Monday, October 19th, 2009
Carob or Chocolate? Hard to tell, isnt it...

Carob or Chocolate? Hard to tell, isn't it...

Hey everyone! I also have the privilege of writing for Backstage Magazine, in addition to being the dating diva for meezoog.com, and today I am linking to my most recent blog on Backstage, as it is most certainly relevant to love, to our dreams, and to our own limitations. I hope that you enjoy it!

“Pretending It’s Chocolate.” http://www.backstage.com/bso/advice-first-person/pretending-it-s-chocolate-1004023295.story

The Engagement Double Standard

Sunday, October 18th, 2009

I went shopping for engagement rings this week. Ok, not really shopping, more like window-shopping. And although I am curious about the diamond that will grace my ring finger in years to come, I moreso went as research: to demystify the ring itself.

After salivating over an exquisite round cut diamond by Robert Coin at Saks, and Stella the saleslady promising my nonexistent fiancee the friends and family discount, I thought about the ring on my way back to work. It was so glimmery, and shimmery, and proud (Stella said it spoke to me. I wonder what it said).

But then two days later, while running over the Williamsburg Bridge, something about those exact characteristics of the engagement ring struck me as strange.

The engagement ring is certainly a way to express commitment and the promise to marry, but it is also a surefire way to tell that a woman is off the market.

Why is it that a woman wears an insanely loud diamond as soon as she is to be married, yet the man wears no symbol of his future bethrothal during the engagement, an engagement which may sometimes last for years?

I thought about the several bad experiences I had been through with engaged men. These men hit on me with the gusto of single men. I, a naïve young woman, was none the wiser as there was no reason for me to suspect that these men might be not only unavailable, but like really unavailable. Upon my finding out, I was crushed (another man down the drain of morality) and also consumed with pity for the soon-to-be-wife- did she have any idea what her fiancee was up to on his Saturday night?

Apparently, in a number of countries outside the US, people don’t run into these issues. This is because the men wear engagement rings in addition to the women.

Male engagement rings are slender and relatively discreet compared to womens’. Many times the engagement ring doubles as the wedding band. Upon the betrothal, the man simply switches the ring from one hand to the other.

When I discovered the existence of male engagement rings, I wrongly assumed that they would exist in countries home to eccentric cultures and religions. On the contrary, they are in fact prevalent in several Western European countries, among them Finland, Sweden, Germany and Denmark, in addition to Brazil and Egypt.

Many people say that a male engagement ring is necessary in this progressive feminist culture where women are increasingly the ones proposing.

There are other countries where the man may not wear a ring, but instead receive a watch from the woman to symbolize the engagement.

As the engagement ring is worn on the fourth finger of the hand because this finger is thought to house the “vein amoris,” a vein that connects straight to the heart, I wonder exactly what the wrist is thought to house.

Do I want my future fiancee to wear an engagement ring? Probably not. But I can’t say that I am totally opposed to the idea…

Finding your Soulmate: The Magic Formula

Wednesday, October 14th, 2009


This weekend I attended a workshop with psychologist Wylie Goodman. The workshop was called, “The Formula for finding your Ideal Mate,” and Saturday marked the first of two sessions. As I walked into the small room, I instantly spotted Ms. Goodman, a petite woman wearing the requisite psychologist spectacles, a woolen skirt, and clogs. I wondered what she knew that I didn’t.

I sat down on a comfy brown couch with three other girls and one really nerdy looking guy, turned off my blackberry, and waited for her to start.

“We often wonder why we keep going after the wrong mates,” she said, perching forward in her loveseat. “But we never stop long enough to figure out who that person is.” Sounds like the usual clichés, I thought, waiting for her to get onto the magic formula.

“Each of you take out a pencil and a piece of paper,” she said. Phew, I thought, the clichéd BS wasn’t going to go on forever.

We obliged, utensils at the ready.

“Now I want you to envision your ideal mate. What is he like physically?” she asked. A hunky blond soccer player with sparkling blue eyes popped into my head. “Now write down his physical characteristics; height, hair color, build, etc,” she continued. Hmm, this was kind of fun, I thought, breaking down David Beckham’s twin on the white college ruled paper.

“Next, imagine your mate’s ideal occupation. Take into consideration the types of hours and travel needs that this job entails. Remember, when they come home at the end of the day, and you ask ‘Honey, how was your day?’ What do you want them to talk about? Also indicate how much money you would like them to make,” she instructed.

An image of a trip to Thailand with my husband to meet with the Thai embassy concerning immigration policy instantly appeared, followed by a black Amex with my name on it. “State Department,” I wrote down in cursive. “Income: A lot?” I scribed next to it (shows how fiscally competent I am).

“Now think about his personality,” she said. She told us to write down all of the personality characteristics we would like in our ideal mate. After that, she continued on to their hobbies, lifestyle (and our lifestyle together), religion, family, parenting style, fiscal attitude, sex drive, and the most interesting category, I thought, fighting style.

In regards to that category, she said, “Since you are going to have to fight, what would be the ideal things for you to fight about?” I scribbled down hastily, “taking the dog out?” I had no idea.

After we had gotten through all the categories, she told us to raise our pieces of paper in the air. Pointing to each of them individually, she said, “Now these people you have created?,” she paused for dramatic effect, “They don’t exist,” she stated confidently.

Well that’s just great, I thought. The other attendees looked similarly disappointed.

“No one will have every single quality that you want in a mate. So, for next week,” she instructed, “your homework is to go through that list and circle the two most important things to you under each category. In addition,” she added, “make a list of five things that you can’t live with and five things you can’t live without.” We dutifully wrote down our homework, third graders again at the end of the class period, only this time it wasn’t Chapters 1-3 on the Boston Tea Party (thank G-d).

Nerdy guy tentatively raised his hand in the air. “Yes?” she asked, eyebrows lifting expectantly.
“What’s the purpose of this?” he asked. I was shocked by the depth of his voice. For such a nerdy looking guy, it was one sexy voice, I thought. I inwardly chastised myself for having passing judgment too soon.

“Well, once you recognize who this person is, you are more likely to see them when they do come along.” Then she put her hand out for his sheet. Looking down it in a matter of seconds, she continued flippantly, “Secondly, we are going to assess whether you are spending time in the right places in order to meet this person. Let me guess,” she continued, looking down at the sheet. “I’m thinking that you are not meeting your sensitive Italian artist on Wall Street?” Sexy voice looked dumbfounded. “That’s what I thought,” she said triumphantly.

“Until next week,” she exclaimed, taking off her spectacles and standing up. Our time was up.
As I followed the others out of the room, I contemplated what we had just done. Looking down my list, I saw qualities that I always known were important but never prioritized.

Furthermore, ten minutes later on the F train, having decided on the five “what I can’t live with” characteristics, I recognized that my ex-boyfriend had every single one of them. Maybe that’s why I was so unhappy.

Next week, I will be curious to see how she analyzes our lists and categories. But even after one week, I feel as if I am being lifted out of a fog, to a place where I can finally see the Jewish politician with whom I am meant to be (sans, sadly, the blue eyes).

Or am I? I guess we will have to wait and see.

To be continued…

Search for your soulmate now at www.meezoog.com, or help your friends find theirs by playing matchmaker…

New Manhattan Hotspots: Whether you are alone or with a date…

Wednesday, October 14th, 2009

http://guestofaguest.com/nyc-nightlife/your-jane-ballroom-alternatives-guide/

Conscious Loving…kind of sounds like a bad 80’s band

Monday, October 12th, 2009

 

                                                                         

Got this in my email today…

Tantra: The Art of Conscious Loving” – Beginner Weekend Seminar

Atmananda is very proud to host this month the world-renowned teachers of Tantra, Charles Muir and Leah Alchin who will be teaching a workshop on the weekend of the 22nd of October (starting with a Puja on October 21st). It is titled “Tantra: The Art of Conscious Loving” and it will liven up your sexual love life in one amazing weekend.

 This seminar is a wonderful introduction to the transformative powers of Tantra Yoga. Whether you attend as a couple or come as a single, it will teach you how to use sexual energy for increased intimacy, spiritual connection, and pleasure beyond your imagination. You will begin to master the many methods of regeneration so you can make love well into your old age, keeping you young for many years to come. Master Charles Muir and Leah Alchin use a down-to-earth, humorous, and candid approach to creating a safe environment for singles and couples.

Need help paying for your seminars?

Help spread the word! Earn “Tantra Dollars” for every person you refer! For each individual who attends the seminar, you will earn a 10% commission. That’s as much as $90 “Tantra Dollars” per couple towards your seminar.

I’m thinking a few things about this…First of all, is conscious loving opposed to unconscious loving? I may be wrong, but i am pretty sure that is called rape… Secondly, i am wondering if the tantra dollar is worth more than the American dollar- does it smell like perfume? or is it laced with some sort of aphrodysiac?

On a serious note, yoga dates are actually super fun. Extremely awkward, but pretty hilarious. Can definitely increase your comfort level together as a couple or a new twosome. They do a lot of joint poses, where you actually lean on each other in order to do the pose- this physical leaning will help you to trust your partner in an emotional sense (that is, if he doesn’t drop you…)

Guest blog: by Anonymous..but we know it’s a man

Friday, October 9th, 2009

This comment was made on my blog,

“Forget the guy, Pick a Man (http://www.meezoog.com/blog/?p=129 ).”       which was written in response to a NY Times article, “Forget the Man, Pick a Guy (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/20/fashion/20love.html).”

I have published this author’s very insightful comments for my female readers to think about.

I read that article too, and thought it was going to be light-hearted until the author discussed her past. Her father was obviously pretty messed up and I feel sorry for anyone who has to gauge men by that impression for the rest of her life. Therapy is in order. However, I think you may be mistaking guys in general for “young” guys. Texting in place of real writing, video games, and impoliteness are signs of lack of intellectual development in general, for either sex. I think the men as the original article describes could be more properly called macho males. They may be emotionally impossible to read, and maddeningly traditional in actions, but are great when you need to be defended (either personally or nationally) or when you need a raccoon removed from your attic. Guys are great pals and partners, but you must realize their shortcomings in other areas. It is an awareness that one male usually cannot provide everything. Men are, after all, just people.

Many thanks to the contributor of this beautifully written blog….

Reassessing Expectations

Friday, October 9th, 2009
Reassessing Expectations
This morning, as she curled her hair tediously with a curling iron and cursed herself for running late, Bernie said to me, “Sam. I’m a bad person.” Used to the dramatics of Ms. Aurange, I asked her simply, “Why is that, Bernie?”
“You know, because of the whole thing with Mark,” she responded. “One minute I think I am not ready for a commitment, the next I am, and the whole time I am planning a rendezvous with the love of my life when he comes into town.”
“Bernie,” I said firmly. “You are not a bad person. You just don’t know what you want. That’s not a horrible thing- it’s just life.”
“But Mark wants a commitment,” she replied. “He is constantly telling me how wonderful I am and how he never likes someone as much as he likes me. I just feel so bad.” she replied. “ Bernie,” I said. “The man is thirty-four. He had to know what he was in for when he got involved with a twenty-three year old.” “Oh,” she said quickly, pausing mid-curl. “I guess you’re right.”
This wasn’t the first time I had heard from an older man frustrated with the all-over-the-place quality of a younger girl; my friend Justin had expressed the same sentiments to me several months ago. He, also particularly enchanted with an early twenty-something girl, was frustrated that she hadn’t expressed her undying love for him and planned the date of their marriage already. I tried to explain to him that, contrary to popular belief, not all women are perusing the Tiffany’s catalog within the first few months of meeting someone.
I told Bernie that as long as she was being clear with Mark about her feelings, however discombobulated they were, she wasn‘t in the wrong. “If he still wants to be with you,” I said, “knowing that a commitment from you isn’t a given, then he is making that decision, and he has to deal with whatever comes with that. Including the fact that he may not be the only one you are seeing.”
Bernie wasn’t really satisfied with that answer, continuing to whine as she tugged up her gray bobby socks (nope, definitely not ready for a commitment). Secretly, I think she likes the idea of having two men at her beck and call. Since that is kind of awesome, I told her.
Knowing what you are in for is an essential part of successfully navigating the dating/relationship world. The reason we are so easy to categorize potential mates into stereotypes (the rebel, the “nice guy“), and to compare them with those who we have dated in the past is because humans don’t like uncertainty. And we would rather make some kind of hypothesis about what is going to happen with Bob by relating it to what happened with Sam or with Joe, even if the hypothesis turns out to be incorrect, rather than to leave the future an amorphous blob of uncertainty.
We familiarize ourself with how certain types of people behave at certain times in order to help us navigate life.
Having the ability to make parallels between people and situations also helps us to be realistic. There may be two times out of ten where the vagabond rock star decides to move back to your home town in Indiana and settle down on a farm, and there may be another two times out of ten where the “nice guy” you are dating doesn’t turn out to be so nice. But that’s only twenty percent. The other eighty, as sad as it may be, usually ring true with what you have experienced in the past, which is also many times the stereotype of that person.
And stereotypes, contrary to popular belief, aren’t always bad. I was reading through my journal yesterday, and something stuck out to me. It read: “I always go after guys pursuing their dreams, passionate and spontaneous. What that means is that I will never be a priority in their lives until they have found out what they are looking for- as they will never be a priority in mine.” With life come tradeoffs. The passion and spontaneity and dreamer qualities that appeal to a lot of women  most of the time don’t correspond with stability, with calling when they say they are going to call, or making a plan in advance for where you are having dinner (that is, if they plan ahead enough to take you to dinner at all.) And the stability and loyalty that we treasure so much as women usually don’t go hand in hand with a last minute trip to Paris, “just because.”
In the last comment on my blog “Forget the Guy, Pick a Man,” a comment  so insightful I am going to republish it for everyone here to see, the writer explained these tradeoffs better than I ever could. He said: “It is an awareness that one male usually cannot provide everything. Men are, after all, just people.”
I think if we women take that into account, our expectations for our mates will be much more realistic- not necessary lower, just more realistic. And as Bernie explained without realizing it, she was discovering that alas, as much as men are just people, so are we.
This morning, as she curled her hair tediously with a curling iron and cursed herself for running late, Bernie said to me, “Sam. I’m a bad person.” Used to the dramatics of Ms. Aurange, I asked her simply, “Why is that, Bernie?”
“You know, because of the whole thing with Mark,” she responded. “One minute I think I am not ready for a commitment, the next I am, and the whole time I am planning a rendezvous with the love of my life when he comes into town.”
“Bernie,” I said firmly. “You are not a bad person. You just don’t know what you want. That’s not a horrible thing- it’s just life.”
“But Mark wants a commitment,” she replied. “He is constantly telling me how wonderful I am and how he never likes someone as much as he likes me. I just feel so bad.” she replied. “ Bernie,” I said. “The man is thirty-four. He had to know what he was in for when he got involved with a twenty-three year old.” “Oh,” she said quickly, pausing mid-curl. “I guess you’re right.”
This wasn’t the first time I had heard from an older man frustrated with the all-over-the-place quality of a younger girl; my friend Justin had expressed the same sentiments to me several months ago. He, also particularly enchanted with an early twenty-something girl, was frustrated that she hadn’t expressed her undying love for him and planned the date of their marriage already. I tried to explain to him that, contrary to popular belief, not all women are perusing the Tiffany’s catalog within the first few months of meeting someone.
I told Bernie that as long as she was being clear with Mark about her feelings, however discombobulated they were, she wasn‘t in the wrong. “If he still wants to be with you,” I said, “knowing that a commitment from you isn’t a given, then he is making that decision, and he has to deal with whatever comes with that. Including the fact that he may not be the only one you are seeing.”
Bernie wasn’t really satisfied with that answer, continuing to whine as she tugged up her gray bobby socks (nope, definitely not ready for a commitment). Secretly, I think she likes the idea of having two men at her beck and call. Since that is kind of awesome, I told her.
Knowing what you are in for is an essential part of successfully navigating the dating/relationship world. The reason we are so easy to categorize potential mates into stereotypes (the rebel, the “nice guy“), and to compare them with those who we have dated in the past is because humans don’t like uncertainty. And we would rather make some kind of hypothesis about what is going to happen with Bob by relating it to what happened with Sam or with Joe, even if the hypothesis turns out to be incorrect, rather than to leave the future an amorphous blob of uncertainty.
We familiarize ourself with how certain types of people behave at certain times in order to help us navigate life.
Having the ability to make parallels between people and situations also helps us to be realistic. There may be two times out of ten where the vagabond rock star decides to move back to your home town in Indiana and settle down on a farm, and there may be another two times out of ten where the “nice guy” you are dating doesn’t turn out to be so nice. But that’s only twenty percent. The other eighty, as sad as it may be, usually ring true with what you have experienced in the past, which is also many times the stereotype of that person.
And stereotypes, contrary to popular belief, aren’t always bad. I was reading through my journal yesterday, and something stuck out to me. It read: “I always go after guys pursuing their dreams, passionate and spontaneous. What that means is that I will never be a priority in their lives until they have found out what they are looking for- as they will never be a priority in mine.” With life come tradeoffs. The passion and spontaneity and dreamer qualities that appeal to a lot of women  most of the time don’t correspond with stability, with calling when they say they are going to call, or making a plan in advance for where you are having dinner (that is, if they plan ahead enough to take you to dinner at all.) And the stability and loyalty that we treasure so much as women usually don’t go hand in hand with a last minute trip to Paris, “just because.”
In the last comment on my blog “Forget the Guy, Pick a Man,” a comment  so insightful I am going to republish it for everyone here to see, the writer explained these tradeoffs better than I ever could. He said: “It is an awareness that one male usually cannot provide everything. Men are, after all, just people.”
I think if we women take that into account, our expectations for our mates will be much more realistic- not necessary lower, just more realistic. And as Bernie explained without realizing it, she was discovering that alas, as much as men are just people, so are we.