Archive for the ‘media’ Category

Distance: A maker or a breaker?

Monday, March 15th, 2010

Doing anything long distance sucks. Long distance phone calls = expensive. Trying to negotiate a return on your mac from a guy in India= awful. Understanding Iraqi culture and mentality from American soil= catastrophic.

Long distance relationships fall right into that category. However, sometimes a little bit of distance is a good thing…

*****

Kelley came into the bar alone, wearing the requisite midtown suit and tie, glasses, and that weary look on his face that says: Give me a cold beer immediately.

As I am the bartender, I obliged him with a cold glass of Sam Adams and asked him where he was from. “Chicago,” he said, with a warm and trusting smile that was definitely more from the  MidWest than New York. “I’m here on work,” he continued.

I smiled back. I wondered if he had a wife back home in Chicago. I looked at his ring finger- Yup.

As I washed a pint glass to prepare for the next customer, I thought to myself, that must be hard, leaving your spouse all the time.

When the bar started to clear out and I had some time to talk to him further, I struck up a conversation with Kelley.

“So what’s it like?” I asked, as casually as possible. “Is traveling for work hard?”

Kelley explained that he only had to work two days out of the week in New York, the rest he spent at home in Chicago.

“Do you have kids?” I asked.

“Yes,” he responsed. “Three- thirteen, seventeen, and twenty. It was hard when my kids were little,” he said, as if reading my mind,” but now that they’re older it has gotten a lot better. And technology has made it so much easier!” he exclaimed.

“Like my thirteen year old daughter chats with me on Facebook- it makes it easier just to know that she’s there,” he said.

I thought back to when I was a little girl and my dad didn’t even have a cell phone- just a beeper. A doctor frequently on call, he would have to run to a pay phone everytime his beeper beeped with a new number and patient.

“But I have to say, there is a good part about being away,” he said. “It makes you appreciate your family so much more. Every moment I have with them I treasure.”

I thought back to my childhood again, of my dad running to the golf course to escape for a little while from the intensity of four girls plus my mother. I guess everyone needs a little time apart.

In the Orthodox Jewish faith, when a woman is in menstruation, the man and woman are required to sleep in separate beds for the duration of her period.

Just having become friendly with a married Orthodox couple who are  my age- and amazingly cool- I asked them if they do that.

“Yes,” Rivvie told me.

“Does it make you want each other more once it’s over?” I asked.

At this point, Rivvie and her husband Rob both nodded at me enthusiastically.

“Yes,” Rob responded. “Being apart for that week, though it’s hard, makes you want each other so much more.”

“It’s like being newlyweds all over again,” he said. I looked at them, together. They were so in love.

The rule of sleeping in separate beds made me think of all of those articles like “What to do when your sex life gets stale,” and “How to add some spice in the bedroom.” Well, this tradition seemed like a pretty basic way to do that me, without having to buy some fancy contraption or suffocate your spouse. There is nothing like a little time apart, and a little physical space, to make you and your body realize how much you want-and need- your significant other beside you.

But don’t go crazy. A large part of a successful relationship is physical intimacy, which can only be achieved when you are together. Emotionally intimacy- and truly getting to know one another, also pinpoints of a successful relationship,  are also difficult without someone’s physical presence.

I guess it’s like everything else in life: true success and happiness come with the right balance.

You’re not sexting…but is your mom?

Wednesday, March 3rd, 2010
Wait till you see my next photo, babycakes...

Wait 'till you see my next photo, babycakes...

So apparently this phenomena that shocked the media and even led to the prosecution of an over 18 “sexter” when naked photos of his ex-girlfriend hit the web is not limited to teens. According to new studies, the baby boomer generation, as in, my dad and your mom, sext more than teens do. So before you pick up your parents phone to look at their pictures, think: do I really want to?

Read the article below on News Now for more info:

http://www.winknews.com/features/83327642.html

Las Cosas del Corazon

Thursday, January 21st, 2010

“Que haces in los Estados Unidos, Samantha?,” the passport control worker said to me. I had just arrived in Chile, excited to begin a writing assignment for a new client. The name on his tag read “Estigio Gomez.” He was a jovial, heavyset Chilean man. I smiled, delighted that I had recently learnt the Spanish word for “writer.”

“Yo soy una escritora,” I replied.

“ Joven para un escritoro, si?” he continued. (You are young for a writer, aren’t you?) I laughed, shaking my head. He smiled. “Que escribes?” (What do you write?)

“Ummm..” I hesitated. This was where my Spanish died. How on earth did you say ‘dating column’ in Spanish?

I didn’t know. So I said it in English, hoping that either the right word would come to me or he would just understand. “I write about dating, relationships, love…” I trailed off at the look on his face. He didn’t get it.“Umm..” I said again. I hated not knowing what I was talking about. “Amor!” I shouted jubilantly. Yes, I knew something that made sense was in there somewhere.

“Ahhhh,” he replied, his face melting into satisfied comprehension.

“Las cosas del corazon,” he said, drawing out the last syllable.

“Si!” I exclaimed. That was exactly right. ‘Cosas’ meant things, ‘Corazon’ meant heart.

I wrote about “the things of the heart.”

After I passed through customs and emerged out into the hot sunny parking lot of the Santiago Airport, I started thinking about the difference between ‘things of the heart’ and the words we usually use to explain the same things.

In America, our “things of the heart’ terminology are the following:    love, relationships, sex, and dating. But do these really describe all the things that go on in our hearts? And does a tendency to ascribe to one of these four indicate that the other things that go on aren’t important?

I realized that the latter was correct: by generalizing into four terms,  other things, emotions, and thoughts related to our hearts are marginalized by ourselves and by society. Thus, people who can’t categorize their feelings or situation into one of these linguistic baths end up feeling bashful and unimportant.

But what’s interesting is that most people, particularly in New York where over half of the population is single aren’t in love, in relationships, having regular sex, or even dating. So does that mean that the emotions in their hearts don’t matter?

Not at all. But in order for those emotions, and for those people to gain an accepted place in society, we need to appreciate other things besides the four catch words. We need to bring words like hook-up, lust, guilt, shame, crush, same-sex partners, into the media and into the general conversation.

So heading towards this Valentine’s Day, don’t feel bad if you aren’t in a relationship, haven’t fallen in love, or don’t have a date.

Because it doesn’t mean that your heart is empty, it just means it’s busy with other things- with friendship, family, nostalgia, ambition, etc. Things that may not be spattered on the cover of Cosmo, but are nevertheless just as important.

Online dating: High School all over again?

Thursday, January 7th, 2010

Sorry, but you should have laid off of the Christmas cookies. You are obviously no longer beautiful- get out of our turf.

Sorry, but you should have laid off of the Christmas cookies. You are obviously no longer beautiful- get off our turf.

So, the online dating scandal of the week has surfaced: thousands of members have been kicked off of Beautifulpeople.com, which claims to be just for the gorgeous, supposedly because they posted pictures of themselves over the holidays and New Year, which apparently weren’t too flattering. Robert Hinze, the founder of the site, actually referred to the supposed online beauty perpetrators as “fatties.” Sounds like a well-bred man.

Besides the fact that the website, and its founder, are ridiculous because well, they are, here’s my opinion: It is impossible on an online dating site to EVER get people to put up photos of how they really look. Because people are putting their best foot forward precisely because of the fact that photos are what people see first, they know that they better be good. That means they might use a picture from three years ago when they were tan and 120 lbs, even if now they aren’t close to that.

So now that we know that people put up their A+ photos, let’s think about how we can actually find out- as the online dating peruser, which of the men or women we’ve picked out on a site based on their photos and profile would actually be attractive to us if we met them in real life? Because this is the ultimate challenge of online dating: finding someone online who you would actually be compatible with and attracted to face-to-face.

There are a few answers to this question.

1)     We can follow up on someone ourselves (facebook, myspace, etc.)

2)     We can talk to friends who actually know them

3)     We can choose our sites wisely, as in the ones who have verification systems for their members

#’s 2 and 3 are only available on one site and one site (or rather network) only. Meezoog created itself as a network precisely so that people could correspond with their prospects in a supportive environment: with information from their friends and member verifications, instead of blindly hoping that “Nycrichhottie” is actually rich and a hottie (of which he is probably neither). Also, because Meezoog only signs up people with their real names, you can check up on them on facebook before you even hit the “message me” button.  Basically, Meezoog is on the up and up. It’s the only dating mechanism online that enables you to come as close as possible to “what you see is what you get.”

But let’s forget about Meezoog for a minute and go back to Beautifulpeople again. Why is the concept so ridiculous? Well, for one, because beauty, as the saying goes, is only skin deep. I, for one, would much rather subscribe to a site for ‘smart people who care about the world’ than one for beautiful people, who can often be self-absorbed, callous, and aloof. But that’s just me.

However, on second thought, let’s let this site thrive, and consume all of the people of the caliber of, for example, Ms. Cooke, one of the site’s loyal members.

“Ms. Cooke says that she’s been on one date since joining the BeautifulPeople.com late last year (so obviously, the site is really working), and that had the man she went out with appeared “chubbier” than he advertised in his photo, she would have been disappointed. After all, it’s beautiful people, she says, and not fat people, who she wants to date.” (ABC News)

Enough said there.

So let’s let these high-caliber individuals take themselves out of the dating market by mating with one another…that is unless they decide to cheat on their “beautiful” significant others or spouses. Oh, no worries, there’s a site for that too. Welcome Ashley Madison, for cheaters who want to have affairs on the sly by putting their photos on the internet. People are just so smart.

Let the scandals continue…

Dating and… Deodorant?

Saturday, December 19th, 2009

Yesterday I had a commercial audition for a line of mens deodorant (I know, I’m not a man- I will explain.)

I tend to keep a completely open mind going into commercial auditions because although sides (a script) may be provided, the audition is usually improv based. So today, all I knew is that I was going in for a pretty, clean-cut girl in her early 20’s- specifically a funny field guide (of course, I had no clue what that was).

They called me into the auditon right after a girl who resembled a barbie doll (like, i actually wanted to touch her hair to see if she was real), and I went in with pretty much no clue what the audition would consist of, particularly since there were no sides at the check-in.
The room was just slightly intimidating- seven people lined the walls, all holding macbooks, eagerly scrutinizing me and my “performance in the audition.” I said hello, made some kind of stupid joke about macs, and sat down in the center of the room.
“Ok,” the woman behind the camera said to me, “So we need you to pretend that you’re on a really boring date. The team will direct you on specific things that you should do.” So I looked around, bit my nails, feigned a few smiles, and then finally fell asleep on the dinner table. Brilliance.

As I left the room, laughing to myself at the hysterical nature of these auditions, I wondered what on earth a boring date had to do with men’s deodorant? I would think a smelly date would have more to do with deodorant than a boring one…

But such is marketing- products utilize the meat-market mentality of dating to illustrate why their product is more likely to help someone attract a mate than its competitors.

What is this world coming to?

Wednesday, December 16th, 2009

http://gawker.com/5427642/rachel-uchitel-inspires-little-girls-everywhere-to-be-one-step-up-from-a-hooker

All I have to say about this is one word: Yikes. How do we send the message to our children that prostitution is not a viable career?

And where in God-s name are our morals?

Also particularly upsetting is “Ask Ashley,” as in Eliot Spitzer’s former prostitute, a column in the New York Post where Ashley gives relationship and sex advice.

A few questions:
Are prostitutes normally in relationships?
Did they screen her for STD’s before giving her this job?
Did she graduate college? Or even go?
And finally, what is this world coming to?

Please, if anyone knows the answers to these questions, enlighten me and our readers.

From Date to Mate

Tuesday, November 24th, 2009

Yes, folks, that is indeed the title of the mockumentary style new TV show in which I play Sara Rappaport, a Jewish girl looking for love in New York via the internet (I’m an actress, in case I didn’t mention that). Although the show is scripted, a lot of it is improv based, so I get to stick my two cents on dating into some of the dialogue.

A lot of interesting ideas are discussed in the show- one of them that I became particularly intrigued with is the concept of settling when you marry someone. The idea is that because it is so unlikely that we will find our ideal mate (and because, for many of us, our ideal mate is completely unrealistic), we end up settling for whoever it is that we do marry.

After thinking about this for a while (and my character going on and on about how unromantic the concept is), I think that this idea has merit. In order to be happy with someone, and to commit ourselves to them monogamously and otherwise, we must accept the fact that they have flaws- and for many of us this may be “settling,” or merely being realistic, because our “ideal mate,” who has lived in our head for years, is flawless.

And let’s face it- even Prince Charming probably has issues. I mean, please, he’s probably off fighting dragons all the time and never sees his wife.

Here is the link to the trailer http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=500304595000&ref=mf

and here is the link to the first episode. This is the first of eight episodes in the season.

http://shalomtv.org/DateToMate_1.htm

If you would rather, you can also watch the show on demand for free. Go to Entertainment on Demand, and click on Shalom TV, and then From Date to Mate.

Also, although on the show my character may belong to a different dating website, my full endorsement goes with Meezoog, as it is the most technologically advanced and savvy way to meet someone compatible via the web.

Find your date, or your mate, or both, now on Meezoog.

For the Love of…What?: The woes of Love and Reality TV

Wednesday, November 11th, 2009

I was watching New York One yesterday and the hosts were exuberantly excited to have on the show reality TV star and hip hop singer, Ray J! In case you didn’t know, he is the star, that’s right ladies and gents, the star, of the reality TV show “For the Love of Ray J.” http://blog.vh1.com/2009-06-09/for-the-love-of-ray-j-2-announced-and-casting/

The show’s name makes me think less of how excited I am, and more “For the Love of G-d, what is happening to our society?”

From Ray J to good old Bret Michael, and let’s face it, even the Bachelor (whoever he may be), people seem to be fascinated by these embarrassingly ridiculous and attention-craving men and their search for the latest “Cocktail” (that was the name of the woman last picked by Ray J) to suit their taste.

The appeal for these shows is not completely non-sensical. Particulary shows like Ray J and Rock of Love are comical in a farcical sense.

And shows like the Bachelorette, and the Bachelor, as the people actually seem to be real humans and not fake-tanned bleached androids, appeal to the human’s universal search for love.

However, when these men flit from one girl to the next, or, in the case of The Bachelorette, when the man who wins her heart is actually sleeping with two other women in his home-town at the same time, (see blog The Cheater who Prevails: Why?) how much are these shows actually a pursuit for love and how much are they just people trying to get their 10 seconds + of fame (and the lucrative endorsements that come with)? Does it warp our perception of what the search for love actually entails, and is like? Or are they just harmless, entertaining parodies?

DJ AM- memorialized by ex-girlfriends?

Tuesday, September 1st, 2009

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,544579,00.html

DJ Am’s death has gotten America in a tizzy. My friend Alexa pointed out to me how she found it interesting that those whom they asked for responses to his death were mainly ex-girlfriends.
I also, found it sort of strange that the media focuses on getting statements from celebrity ex-girlfriends to memorialize him rather than his family, the ones who really knew him.

The Cheater who prevails: Why?

Monday, August 24th, 2009

I was reading US magazine on the elliptical today at the gym, and again, saw a story about Jillian Harris (the bachelorette) and her bachelor of choice, Ed Swiderski. The week before I had been reading another article about the twosome: an expose detailing Ed’s infidelity with two other women while he was dating Harris.

The detailed texts and emails that the two cheated upon women provided to US magazine were blatant evidence that this man was definitely having sexual engagements with, and even professing love, to women besides the one that he had proposed to on TV. On top of it all, some of the emails he sent to the other women were vulgar, crass, and sexual.

This wasn’t the first time that I heard that a number of the bachelors on the show had come on the show with girlfriends at home- and as actress I would be lying if I didn’t tell you that breakdowns for reality shows don’t come through our casting networks all the time. Why do you think everyone is so gosh darn beautiful?

SO it’s not hard to believe that Mr. Swiderski came on the show for very ulterior motives than “finding his true love.” Instant fame is not exactly a bad deal, with or without a new wife attached.

Anyway, the article this week said that Ms. Harris had decided to stay with Mr. Swiderski despite the the blatant evidence that this man is a total deuchebag.

She also disparaged the “other” women, saying that they were lying and that their feeble attempts to get Ed back (bc that is so obviously what they were doing) made them look foolish.

This is not the first time that I have witnessed a man who cheats on his significant other, but yet when the woman finds out, she blames the “other woman” instead of confronting the man or breaking up with him (I mean, helllooo).

What is the deal with this? Are women so attached to their men and “blinded by love” as the phrase says that they can’t recognize the seriousness of infidelity and where the blame actually lies?

Many times , the girl who fools around with the unavailable man may not even know that he is unavailable. Also, it is the man’s decision as much as the girl’s to engage in sexual activity together, if not moreso, as men typically seduce the women.

So what is the deal with this?